Friday, September 21, 2012

Open Letter To Amber Goodhand Ryland/Radar Online #CASEYANTHONY

It has recently come to my attention that on January 9, 2012 on the Jane Velez Mitchell show you slandered  me on national television in regards to the above web site CaseyCanSing.com aka HollyBriley.com
Since I do not watch JVM I did not at the time know this happened. I had to read about it on another website where your slanderous statements regarding me are being repeated.
On this show you said:
“With all the speculation that she`s been trying to release the photos or maybe a TV special and had some hands in releasing this, I found a new Web site today called CaseyCanSing.com. Now, when you go to that Web site, it redirects you back to a YouTube page which, oddly enough, is the page of Holly Briley, who was one of the first to post…”
Had you done your homework on this particular website you quoted as being linked back to me you would have found out that I did not register this site at all, had you reached out to me and asked I would have told you that and would have been more than happy to tell you what I found out about this site when I did some simple research on it.. and its registrant.
Registrant:
Ligornetto & Co.
1275 Ponte Vedra Blvd.
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida 32082
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: HOLLYBRILEY.COM
Created on: 05-Jan-12
Expires on: 05-Jan-13
Last Updated on: 05-Jan-12
Administrative Contact:
Francisco, Paul  …..Fancycatone@gmail.com
Ligornetto & Co.
1275 Ponte Vedra Blvd.
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida 32082
United States
(352) 502-3515
Technical Contact:
Francisco, Paul  …..Fancycatone@gmail.com
Ligornetto & Co.
1275 Ponte Vedra Blvd.
Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida 32082
United States
(352) 502-3515
Domain servers in listed order:
NS65.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
NS66.DOMAINCONTROL.COM

Had you gone farther into any sort of research on this topic rather than run to the phone to tell the salacious albeit it FALSE and SLANDEROUS details you would have found about this registrant as I did, you would have found out that Mr Francisco was once a client of Jose Baez. http://governingbodyletters.blogspot.com/2011/01/watch-out-for-brother-paul.html. – This is just one of his many arrest. He is a class act con artist.

Further research by you would have revealed that I managed to have the site .. that goes back to You Tube, as well as the many others he FALSELY opened in my name taken down for impersonation. http://www.youtube.com/hollybriley.

Please do not take this as a threat, but I have consulted an attorney regarding these slanderous statements. While it is true JVM went to commercial after your claim you, being the media personality with the following you have, could have… should have followed up on this matter and corrected it. I am not looking to get money from you… I simply want the truth ….THE TRUTH printed, and the TRUTH to be known.
Please, feel free to contact me regarding this.

Respectfully,
Holly Briley
Fax copy to Radar Online LLC

AUTHOR’S NOTE : - I often wonder what kind of story there is or could have been if Ms Goodhand would have followed up with this and ferreted out why a known con man and coincidentally a former client of Jose Baez’s would have opened such sites in the first place. … It would not have been the first time an attorney used the social media to discredit someone for their client. And we all know Jose used social media during the Anthony trial.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Judge Judy Mocks Your Butt Hurt Brianne

A few days ago Brianne posted a comment that was immediately spammed, but it contained some batshit crazy rants about someone from CBS contacting me and if I didn’t respond she would automatically “win.”

To be quite truthful, I didn’t pay it much attention as with all of her other threats of court proceedings, lawsuits, cease and desist orders I just roll my eyes and laugh. Its well established her M.O. is

-Threaten a lawsuit -Warn of an upcoming cease and desist order -Fake up some bogus paperwork and post it -Throw some attorneys name around that she has Googled -File false DMCA claims against you and your works -Rinse and Repeat above steps

Hell I'm still waiting on the cease and desist order she’s been yammering about since February.

But I have to say her latest threat took even me for a loop!

She wants me to appear on JUDGE JUDY with her! ! !



 Judge Judy!!!! OMG I have to give it to her on this one, I did not see it coming.

She has tried her hardest to be the victim and to get famous.. but Judge Judy is a first!!

I will give my answer now to this fuckery … are you listening Brianne?


Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Sarah Krefft Or Should I Say Brianne Chantal – Come On Down!

You’re the next contestant on Out That Alt  !


For a few weeks now a Tweeter calling herself Sarah Krefft, from Chicago, has been all over Twitter licking Brianne and Murt’s collective taints.


‘Sarah’ first contacted me via Twitter back in July in some bizarre claim in which she said (she) wished to mediate between myself and Brianne. Besides this contact being out of the blue, she only followed (at the time) myself and Brianne. This  was a dead giveaway as to who she really was… Brianne.


When I blew her off, she as all of Brianne’s other alts tend to do, she became belligerent and turned nasty. Before long Brianne and ‘Sarah’ were BFFs and she was tweeting information and blogspots about me. It was really quite something to see. Im not going to post all the tweets here, because this is really not about what she tweeted… much past the fact she said she lives in Chicago, even having a facebook page to this effect.

 












Besides a twitter profile and  Facebook page there is almost NO trail of this person anywhere. Her Facebook page claims she went to University of Chicago but a google search of “Krefft University of Chicago” turns up nothing, as does a search for “Krefft Northwestern Memorial Hospital” where she claims she worked till 3 yrs ago. As for Dan Krefft, her alleged husband, no sign of anyone by that name in Illinois. Of course then could all be easily explained by her saying she went by a maiden name, her husband goes by a middle name and/or they just moved to Chicago. Could be, if we were actually talking about a real person.

I tried to bait ‘Sarah’ on Twitter into saying she was actually in Chicago at that very moment, but the closest she would come is to say she would be calling the Chicago PD on me, etc, so I just waited.







































































The night I was baiting her on Twitter, my Twitter account was suspended, as was hers. This gave Brianne the perfect opportunity to say that ‘Sarah’ and I were indeed the same person..which of course we are not.. she even had a couple of her alts posting about it and saying we were suspended at the ” exact same time” which isnt quite true, buts it's Brianne's 578567th personality Sarah's spin.




























By now you’re probably saying “get to the point Holly” so here is the point. 

For a couple weeks Ive been corresponding with someone who had been corresponding with ‘Sarah’ who was more than willing to spill to this person everything she had made up knew about me.


She corresponded via email, and when this email’s IP was checked.. it came straight out of O’Canada!


This is the correspondence, and IP tracker, that I am using with the full permission of the person that gave it to me.






























Busted again, Brianne.. but thanks for playing.

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Canada Allows For Parody



Canada’s Statutes on Forgery and Uttering a Forged Document vs. Canada’s Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11 passed in June 2012)

Canadian Laws/Statutes:
“Forgery and Offences Resembling Forgery”
Forgery
366. (1) Every one commits forgery who makes a false document, knowing it to be false, with intent
(a) that it should in any way be used or acted on as genuine, to the prejudice of any one whether within Canada or not; or
(b) that a person should be induced, by the belief that it is genuine, to do or to refrain from doing anything, whether within Canada or not.

Making false document
(2) Making a false document includes
(a) altering a genuine document in any material part;
(b) making a material addition to a genuine document or adding to it a false date, attestation, seal or other thing that is material; or
(c) making a material alteration in a genuine document by erasure, obliteration, removal or in any other way.

When forgery complete
(3) Forgery is complete as soon as a document is made with the knowledge and intent referred to in subsection (1), notwithstanding that the person who makes it does not intend that any particular person should use or act on it as genuine or be induced, by the belief that it is genuine, to do or refrain from doing anything.
Forgery complete though document incomplete
(4) Forgery is complete notwithstanding that the false document is incomplete or does not purport to be a document that is binding in law, if it is such as to indicate that it was intended to be acted on as genuine.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 324.



Punishment for forgery
367. Everyone who commits forgery
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 367; 1994, c. 44, s. 24; 1997, c. 18, s. 24.

Uttering forged document
368. (1) Everyone who, knowing that a document is forged,
(a) uses, deals with or acts on it, or
(b) causes or attempts to cause any person to use, deal with or act on it,
as if the document were genuine,
(c) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or
(d) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
NOTE:  I don’t think spoofing a document would constitute a crime under this statute whatsoever.  Clearly, uttering a forged document is when you forge a doc, and expect it to pass for real, thereby acting on it or having others act on it.  The other forgery statutes seem more on point. 

Wherever forged
(2) For the purposes of proceedings under this section, the place where a document was forged is not material.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 368; 1992, c. 1, s. 60(F); 1997, c. 18, s. 25.

False messages
372. (1) Everyone who, with intent to injure or alarm any person, conveys or causes or procures to be conveyed by letter, telegram, telephone, cable, radio or otherwise information that he knows is false is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.

Indecent telephone calls
(2) Everyone who, with intent to alarm or annoy any person, makes any indecent telephone call to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Harassing telephone calls
(3) Everyone who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 330.


Copyright Modernization Act – BILL C-11 HAS BEEN PASSED
The fair dealing reforms, which add parody, satire, and education to the list of fair dealing categories, represent an attempt to strike a balance between those seeking a flexible fair dealing provision and those opposed to new exception categories altogether… The government rightly rejected misleading claims that the changes will permit unlimited, uncompensated copying.

Directly from a Canadian Govt website:
Harper Government Delivers on Commitment to Modernize Canada's Copyright Laws
Ottawa, June 29, 2012—Today, the Honourable Christian Paradis, Minister of Industry, and the Honourable James Moore, Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages, announced that new legislation designed to modernize Canada's copyright laws has received Royal Assent.
"Our Government recognizes the critical role that modern copyright laws play in protecting and creating jobs in Canada's digital economy," said Minister Paradis. "We have delivered on our commitment to modernize Canada's copyright legislation and strike the right balance between the needs of creators and users."
"This is the most comprehensive effort to modernize our copyright laws in over a decade," said Minister Moore. "It is widely supported by creator groups, consumer organizations and the businesses that drive Canada's economy."
A critical element of the Copyright Modernization Act is the requirement that Parliament revisit the Copyright Act every five years. This will serve as a reminder to current and future Parliaments and governments of the important role that modern and updated copyright laws play in our economy.
For further information (media only), please contact:
Margaux Stastny
Director of Communications
Office of the Honourable
Christian Paradis
Minister of Industry
613-995-9001
Media Relations
Industry Canada
613-943-2502

Government of Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada
Balanced Copyright
balancedcopyright.gc.ca
Common menu bar
·         Français
·         Home
·         Contact Us
·         Help
·         Search
·         canada.gc.ca
What the Copyright Modernization Act Means for Consumers
The Copyright Modernization Act allows for everyday uses of content and provides clear rules that will better enable Canadians to participate in the digital age. Key changes include:
Fair dealing for parody and satire: The Bill enables the use of copyrighted materials to create a parody or satire, provided the use is considered "fair."
FYI:
The original 2004 Canadian Supreme Court case that opened the door to “parody” and the recent revamping and modernization of their Copyright Laws:
CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada ruling
The Supreme Court ruling on CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada (March 2004) is a crucial ruling on fair dealing and library photocopying which emphasizes the importance of user rights.
The Supreme Court in the CCH Judgment argued that fair dealing constitutes a user right balanced against the rights of the copyright holder. Furthermore the Supreme Court has argued that fair dealing should be broadly, not narrowly, interpreted. That said, fair dealing needs to fit the five permitted purposes (see no. 1 below).
The Supreme Court provided in the CCH decision six factors for deciding whether or not something is fair dealing:
  1. The purpose of the dealing will be fair if it is for one of the allowable purposes under the Copyright Act, namely research, private study, criticism, review or news reporting.
  2. The character of the dealing
    Single copies are fine, multiple copies tend to be unfair.
  3. The amount of the dealing
    "...for the purpose of research or private study, it may be essential to copy an entire academic article or an entire judicial decision."
  4. Alternatives to the dealing
    "...patrons [of a Library]... cannot reasonably be expected to always conduct their research on-site..."
  5. The Nature of the work
    "...the Access Policy puts reasonable limits on the Great Library's photocopy service."
  6. Effect of the dealing on the work
    "...no evidence ...to show that the market for the publishers' works had decreased as a result of these copies having been made." 



Friday, July 27, 2012

What Ive Learned From Brianne Chantal Patterson

Where to begin? First of all, Ive learned that those crazy stalker types you see in movies really do exist, and they are just as ruthless, evil, deceptive and manipulative, if not more so in real life.
 
When we gave Brianne and her lies the heave ho and outed her for her attempt to use us for her own fame, this is when the lessons started in full.
Soon the supposed PMs I sent her via Facebook came out.


 Know without a doubt I never sent such a PM, nor would I ever send such a PM, but I had to find out just how she did it.  With one quick ‘How to fake a facebook pm’ search on Google revealed just how she did this. It really is pretty easy to fake this stuff.


Before I encountered Hairy McScarry, I never knew such programs existed. I mean you can literally find one to fake PMs, DMs, text messages, entire conversations.These programs are intended to prank your friends and most of them say this in disclaimers, but this never stops The Beast of Burnaby Brianne from using them for her evil purposes.
Brianne also has no compunction about getting other people involved in  defaming those who she feels wronged her. She also isnt above making up lies to post about people, like the many she has written about us and our children’s friends and the friends family.  Im personally so glad the family she implicated in this none sense continues to actively pursuing their legal options in this matter.

When she was caught trying to shop yet another bogus story regarding us, our daughter and Casey Anthony all living together in Florida. She just does not care who she hurts or how big the LIE, if it suits her need for revenge or if she thinks it will bring her her 15 minutes, she’ll tell it.

This includes telling it to and lying to Law Enforcement Officers, both in her country and in this country as well. Because of these lies, I now have an entire folder of Police Reports as well as correspondence to/from one particular RCMP officer. An officer who most recently accused me of uttering forged documents. An officer who probably needs to look up the legal meaning of such accusations before making them and who recently I had to fill out a formal complaint on, but that’s a story for another time.

Ive also learned that Brianne has zero talent when it comes to actually doing anything herself, which is why she steals other people’s original works and tries to file false DMCA claims on them as her own, and if she cant get them taken down by the host company, she simply tries to find other ways to get them pulled by the host, as she has done on more than one occasion with myself as well as many other people.

There is really no low too low for her to stoop to in her revenge/defame game.
This girl lies, cheats, steals, stalks and defames. She is pure evil, and anyone who has read this blog, ever had any kind of dealings with her or googled her name knows this.
For as ruthless and evil as she is, she is also stupid because she LOVES to brag about all of her activities, and she has bragged to myslef and others time and time again.

When we had our truce, that I was more than willing to keep, but she just had to break for another shot at fame, that and she became spooked (she spooks very easily with very good reason..she has many crimes to be worried about people uncovering)  when another blogger said she spoke to the FBI about Brianne. But while we were truced up she admitted to filing false claims, faking all kind screen shots, messages, etc. She was more than happy to share these deeds of hers, and Ive been more than happy to have since shared them with authorities and those she bragged about wronging.

The funniest thing Ive learned from Brianne is, when it all goes South and people are getting wise to you, simply delete everything thing you’ve ever written, and deny it all. When all that fails .. threaten. She LOVES to threaten, even when the threats are absurdly hilarious, she makes them.. and I believe on some level in her disturbed mind, she believes them too. By the way Brianne, Im still waiting on my letter from Judge Judy and CBS.
Ive been called a bully, bitch, stalker, you name it since starting this blog. Ive told many times my reasons for starting this blog, and why I will continue this blog.. BUT.. the one thing Ive always relied on is the truth.

The TRUTH.

Something Brianne Chantal Patterson is not acquainted with.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Brianne Chantal Patterson Impersonating Ripoff Report dot Com Now?

Complaint submitted Friday June 22, 2012 titled: Brianne Chantal Patterson by a "Mel." Convenient since Mel is one of Brianne's fake VIP Tattler names. If I were playing Vegas odds, I would bet this is just another case of Brianne stalking herself.

You can read the report by clicking HERE.  When reading the comments, pay close attention to #4. Its supposedly written by Ripoff Reports itself, which is laughable because they're pretty unscrupulous and will post anything as witnessed by some of the reports about people Brianne has managed to get on here over the years, that and the IP bans Brianne pretending to be them they promised never happened. Not to mention it uses a version of Brianne's favorite phrase "just because it's on the internet, doesn't make it true."

Oh to wonder what ROR would do if they realized they were being impersonated? If image below is too small, click here to see bigger .. click twice when image comes up.


Saturday, June 23, 2012

@VIPTattler Owned By @BrianneChantal - Proof! Can You Believe She Lied AGAIN?! *Thud*

Today Brianne, or as we like to call her around here, Brinocchio, has lied yet again!? 

I know, I know surprising but true. 

Earlier today she VIPTattler went on a rant of denials in regards to her ownership of the craptastic celeb blog, VIPTattler.

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE-My Answers To It Are In Red.
She went so far as to insult the intelligence of people by saying "they" set me up with the whole new staff members post. See below:

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
She even tweeted it all out as VIPTattler.. Its really so cute when she talks to herself on Twitter. And by cute, I mean strange and demented. 

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Now this might all been have left right here, but thanks to the internet and a little thing called cache, I can prove that Brianne has lied .. again. 

Below you will find a posting from a blog called whatisthismadnesshere. It is now unpublished, but you can see the entire post here. In this post you will clearly see that Brianne Chantal Patterson acting as the owner of VIPTattler claimed DMCA violations against her former boss, the owner of Vagabond & Scallywag, Christopher Koulouris. 
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Brinocchio, Brinocchio.. do you ever get tired of being BUSTED?! 


@VipTattler Employee "Mel" Seems Very Unhappy w/ @BrianneChantal's Antics As Seen On Rip Off Report !

Originally posted on RadioNewzBlog

  "In the past month or so she has promised tickets to concerts such as One Direction, Madonna, to taping of the X Factor show and she never delivers on these tickets. She uses this as ruse to get people to give their personal information to her and to get people to visit her website. She always has some excuse or says they were given away, but never says to who.
  Most recently she also launched a website trying to solicit donations for the infamous Casey Anthony who was acquitted of killing her young child. While she denies this, its been long suspected that she has been working for Casey and even funneling money to her. She has bragged to several people including Devon Thomas and Michelle Dawn Smith that she made 50K when she sold a Casey Anthony video. At the time she was trying to get more videos from them promising she could make them rich when she sold them."
Complete report can be found on Rip Off Report, here. 

Friday, June 22, 2012

@briadoublene aka @BrianneChantal @VIPTattler Solicits Donations For Casey Anthony !!

Brianne Chantal, the confirmed owner of VIPTattler is now soliciting donations for Casey Anthony!

In her true form, she creates the account, then creates a Twitter handle to tweet this information out. As with all of her many many alts, she tweets this information to me only .... then quickly deletes the account. 

I suspect she did this for many reasons, but Im sure she did this to get hits to her bogus celeb blog, but most importantly to get a big story when she 'reveals' that my husband and I are the ones behind the donation site. We are NOT in anyway associated with it or with Casey Anthony, but true to her lying psychotic mentality, this wont prevent her from saying it. 

The joke is on her this time, as all this information has been forwarded to proper authorities as well as Morgan and Morgan, the attorneys for Zenaida Gonzalez. 

Seems Hairy McScarry really screwed the pooch this time! 

Below are screen shots of it all.. click on images to enlarge:

NOTICE THIS ACCOUNT ONLY TWEETS TO ME AND FOLLOWS ONLY ONE PERSON - ME.
DESPERATE ATTEMPT FOR HITS

SURPRISE SURPRISE - VIP "BREAKS" THE STORY!

BOYCOTT ALL GONE

UPDATE :

Though Brianne denies stalking me or this blog, no sooner than this story went out Brianne VIPTattler issued a denial:

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
I welcome you to seek legal indemnification for this.. really. Please do, then all of YOUR dirty little secrets will come to light and everyone will know about your "colorful internet posting." But don't worry, when I counter... and I will, I'll let you and your mom stay in your subsidizes housing apartment... you'll just be paying ME rent, and I don't accept charity.

UPDATE:

As of this morning, June 23, 2012, Matt Morgan of Morgan and Morgan are aware of Brianne's Casey Anthony donation website and in his words "watching closely." If I had to bet, this means there will be subpoenas flying come Monday morning.

CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Brianne has always wanted to be famous and known, and I do believe she is well on her way to it. Probably not the way she intended..

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

@AnneChantal aka Brianne Chantal - Stalker Much?

Seriously don't you have a job or something to do? Something.. anything besides stalk this blog all day? 

Today Ive had over 200 hits on this blog and over half have been FROM YOU! 

These are just the last 25 .. and *tag* you're it. 

Stalker Of The Day! 

Freak Of The Century! 





Stalkers Gonna Stalk .. And By Stalkers I Mean Brianne Chantal



Last night on the other blog I write for, Radio Newz Blog, I made a comment to a post about Jeff Ashton's writing a book. In this comment I mentioned I have a  blogger friend who wrote a book.

A poster name wait.... made a comment trying to stir trouble and I suspect trying to get me to mention the bloggers name. I'd be a fool to do so, especially given the furor of Brianne's crazy. 

Being suspicious, I checked the IP of the commenter, and sure enough, it came from Burnaby, British Columbia. Home of none other than Brianne Hairy McScarry Chantal Patterson. 

CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE


CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Do you ever get tired of being busted, Brianne?

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

@BrianneChantal @annechantal @briadoublene Sings Poor Poor Pitiful Me

Let me ask you Brianne - How does it feel?

Youve made my and my family's life a living hell with your constant lies and harassment of us since January 2012.. and yes YOU even threatened. Remember that? I do. 

Now you want to play the victim card? Sorry Hairy McScarry, but that dog dont hunt. 

You want to lie and say you've received threats? Not from me or anyone in my family.. though I can imagine with the long long list of people you've lied about, you've harassed and you've threatened and ripped off, there are some that have more of a reason than I to do so.

You're a liar and a freak.

On youre way off of Twitter (though we know you'll never really leave) don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you!

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

@BrianneChantal @VIPTattler Closes Shop - Rips Off Peope On Madonna Tickets -

Bye Bye to Hairy McScarry's blog VIPTattler. Brianne and her other 287387 personalities  employees have decided to close up shop. And after she boasted today has been the biggest day ever on her blog!


CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE


This also begs the question . . how did she rip off all of those people who entered to win the Madonna tickets she was giving away. .. Answer - She NEVER HAD THEM! She as usual just strung people along with her lies.. then when the heat gets too much.. she deletes and runs.

Thanks to the power of Topsy .. I have the tweets to prove it! 

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Although the original article is now gone, here is a cached version of the story.

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE 
You may also read the cached version here.

And here is the cached version of the now defunct VIPTattler's site for the Madonna tickets give-a-way

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Article cached here.